Imagine a compliance platform costs you $12,000 per year. How much is it?
It depends on what you’re replacing.
If automated collection eliminates hundreds of hours repetitive evidence collection in a tangled technology landscape, $12,000 could be well-spent. If a company of seven could have the same proof in two hours per month, the amount is very different.
That’s a useful way to approach the search for a Vanta alternative. The question of which platform offers the greatest features is not the only thing to consider. Find out what features bring your company savings in time and work.
Automation has an economic break-even At this
Automating compliance isn’t inherently good or bad. Its value varies with the size. Imagine a technology firm that is growing, with multiple cloud environments, many applications and frequent changes to access. The task of collecting evidence constantly could be extremely heavy. Integrations that automatically monitor systems and collect evidence can quickly justify their cost.
Imagine a startup with 10 employees who are preparing for their first SOC 2. It may have a relatively smaller infrastructure, and the collection of evidence could be managed with no significant automation.
Vanta pricing is based on this difference. While a well-developed platform can provide a variety of capabilities however, they’re only useful when the organization is required by the company.
Compare Architecture, not Just Brands
Vanta Vs Drata is a discussion that can easily become a feature-by-feature test. The two platforms are built upon automation and are integrated and therefore, companies seeking this approach can benefit from having a look at the frameworks available along with their integrations and services and individual quotes and contracts.
You’ll need to make a decision on the other thing first. Do you think your business is ready for an integration-driven compliance system at all? Some businesses prefer continuous monitoring as well as automated evidence collection and automated evidence gathering. Others prefer to produce their own evidence, especially in cases of low workload.
Vanta Competitors Don’t All Use the same model
A number of well-known Vanta rivals compete in a market that has a similar focus on automation. There are also lightweight platforms that are designed to focus on the organization of systems rather than a large amount of connectivity.
CertAssist is in the second category. It was developed by compliance consultants and internal auditors, CertAssist organizes framework controls in a central workspace, gives editable policies as well as evidence-based guidance. It also allows auditors to examine evidence submitted by gaining restricted access.
It doesn’t install agents or connect to infrastructure systems. Customers can upload their own evidence.
Factor System Access to the Decision
Removal of integrations comes with an obvious disadvantage: somebody must gather evidence by hand.
It also gets rid of integration setup and this means that the compliance application does not require standing connections to the company’s operational environment.
Both are equally effective. Which tradeoff is right for your company?
CertAssist will target teams of between five to 200 members. Its pricing is publicized instead of requiring a sales call to get the initial figure. The starting price is $225 per month, which is comparable to the usual price of $375 a month.
Let Complexity take its rightful Place
The requirements for a start-up that a 10 person company has today may differ at 100 or even 500 employees.
Although compliance is easy A lightweight platform could make sense. As employees, systems, frameworks, and requirements for evidence grow, the economics will eventually favor greater automation. It’s better to let complex technology of compliance earn its rightful place.
Don’t spend money on fifty integrations simply because they look attractive in a chart of comparison. They’re well worth the money in situations where the task they replace is more expensive than doing them manually.